Best Critical Thinking Podcasts ()

 

critical thinking podcast

The Critical Thinking Initiative podcast is a response to the low critical thinking outcomes among U.S. students across all levels of education. Each episode dispels myths about teaching critical thinking education and discusses cutting-edge, research-supported ways to actually improve critical thinking in . Aug 16,  · ‎The Critical Thinking Initiative podcast is a response to the low critical thinking outcomes among U.S. students across all levels of education. Each episode dispels myths about teaching critical thinking education and discusses cutting-edge, research-supported ways to actually improve critical th /5(22). The podcast teaches both technical analyses and soft skills like communication. Each week we discuss concepts to help listeners advance their strategy, operations and implementation skills, enhance their critical thinking ability and build their executive pr.


Home | The Critical Thinker Academy


In a world where human reasoning is increasingly seen as contaminated by irrational errors and prejudices, social scientists must endeavour to engage with critical thinking and acknowledge bias.

For tech philosopher Tom Chatfield, this involves attempting to be more reasonable about the world, using arguments and explanations to explain phenomena, while being part of critically engaged discourse in which social scientists are listening to other people and are prepared to engage with ideas with an open mind. In this podcast, Chatfield argues that to reason critically one must be alert to various forms of bias. Bias is not inherently toxic to critical thinking — indeed, it is contended that no knowledge escapes bias, critical thinking podcast.

For example, the height of Everest is surely an objective fact. But how is this measured? From land, from under the sea, including snow-caps, not including snow-caps? Knowledge has to exist in context. Chatfield goes on to explore how new digital realities interact with existing human biases, explaining that human bias can become embedded into our creations, before contemplating potential digital futures. Still, to reason critically, he says, means being alert to various forms of bias.

Tom Chatfield, welcome to Social Science Bites. Critical thinking, what do you mean by that? TC: What I mean by critical thinking is our attempts to be more reasonable about the world. And so this tends to involve coming up with reasoned arguments that support conclusions. Reasoned explanations that seek to explain why things are the way they are. TC: So logic is certainly critical thinking podcast of this. What else is likely to be true?

But I think more and more, we also need to roll into this the scientific and empirical method of seeking explanations, forming hypotheses, testing theories. And, this is the additional bit for me, building into all this our growing knowledge about human bias, the predictable biases in the way we think.

Bias is what? A distortion of our thinking? Our thinking becoming infected by error in some way? TC: So I have a bit of a problem with a lot of the idea around kind of infection and bias being this bad thing we would be better off without.

When we talk about bias, critical thinking podcast, we are certainly talking about an inaccurate account of the way things actually are, critical thinking podcast. So it presupposes the idea that there is an objective reality out there, that the world is a certain way.

And then that our accounts of it are falling short of this. But I think the problem is that there is no unbiased account out there, critical thinking podcast. And how these, too, often have certain biases and assumptions baked into them. That sounds very postmodernist. If I say that Mt. TC: Absolutely. And I deeply dislike the kind of postmodernism that lets alternative facts in through the back door, critical thinking podcast.

Knowledge about the world has to exist in some kind of context, critical thinking podcast, it has to have a framework and a framing, critical thinking podcast. There are a whole range of different heights out there for the height of this particular mountain, just as there critical thinking podcast a whole range of different names for it. And there are a whole range of micro disputes over whether you measure a mountain from mean sea level, snow caps, earthquakes, whether you should be counting undersea mountains, whether you should be looking at the bulges in the earth.

By which I mean, not to let the fact that these things are qualified be the enemy of saying that some things are more or less true or valid. But I think there is always a context which is a human and information gathering, and measurement and knowledge context within which this stuff exists. And that becoming more aware of that context is what allows us to refine and improve it and remain open to surprises. And be really, really rigorous. Is it fair to say that actually, critical thinking podcast, you think that what we humans suffer from most acutely is not bias in the sense of outright error, but rather that we have heuristics.

We have general rules that on occasion go wrong. TC: So I think the word heuristic is a really useful one. It means a rule of thumb, a kind of mental shortcut. And it is very clear that there is too much information out there, too many things happening too fast, that the idea of making sense of things must involve shortcuts. And in evolutionary and historical terms, if all humans did was sit around scratching their heads for 25 minutes every time they had to decide whether or not to take a step forwards or run away from an angry lion, we would just be very smart corpses, critical thinking podcast.

And so we have a lot of extraordinarily useful and powerful shortcuts for resolving the kind of overwhelming information and options into frameworks, meaningful decisions, and preferences, critical thinking podcast. DE: Give me an example of these shortcuts that do so well for the vast majority of our life and then occasionally go wrong with bad consequences.

Critical thinking podcast use the emotional intensity of our reaction to something as a guideline to decision making. What would you like to eat? And also because your emotions are quite a complex biochemical decision making algorithm, critical thinking podcast. They are a central part of your being and your survival. And the affect heuristic throughout history has been trained up to guide us pretty well in the kind of settings that our critical thinking podcast, over hundreds of thousands of years probably faced.

What foods to go for, what to run away from, how for example, to raise these incredibly vulnerable offspring that humans produce in contrast to other animals.

How to collaborate to an unprecedented degree as social organisms. And of course today in the blink of an eye, historically speaking, we are suddenly connected not only to screens, media representations, but to millions and millions of strangers. And many of these strangers are very interested in using heuristics to manipulate us, to get us to buy things, to take certain decisions.

And so suddenly the stuff that was a very good guide critical thinking podcast forming relationships like behaving charitably, perhaps, or empathetically towards people in trouble, becomes an opportunity for spam email to come whizzing into our inbox and beseeching us for help.

DE: To pick up on that, we may get a spam email telling us that our distant cousin in Nigeria has been robbed and we should send money immediately into the following bank account. TC: Absolutely right. Advertising, conning, manipulation. Also, interestingly, what you want to do is allow the vulnerable to self-select. And so a lot of scams are really critical thinking podcast if you are a sophisticated, experienced user of technology.

You better explain what those are. So a very difficult question might be who will make the best next president or prime minister? We talked here about recency and availability. And really all of these words are moving around the same point, critical thinking podcast, critical thinking podcast is that we are prone to treating how easily something comes to mind as an indicator of its truth or validity.

And this is not critical thinking podcast true. One very simple example is to do with advertising and celebrity endorsements. You may think of a famous face associated with crisps or chips depending upon your country.

Now is it likely that that which came most easily to mind is also the best? Is also the finest purveyor of fried potato products in the world? Probably not. Sometimes it can be more dangerous, however.

Because cancer, in its many and varied forms, is often quite a public and prolonged disease. It is of course a massive killer. A lot of well-known and famous people and cases have emerged from this.

And yet, heart disease kills more than twice as many people each year globally as cancer, critical thinking podcast. We critical thinking podcast often very willing to let our emotional reaction double as truth and be substituted for what we think of as truth.

And that is even more important when it comes to more controversial or important decisions in our lives. And this is a rather easy example, and you can try it for yourself.

Are there more words in the English language that either A, begin with the letter K, critical thinking podcast, or that have the letter K as their third letter. Have a quick think about that. This is a very neat example of the fact that we are extraordinarily willing to treat the ease or the coherence of something as synonymous with its likelihood or truthfulness, critical thinking podcast. When in fact, we should be very cautious about this.

Is that an outright bias or is that a heuristic? And when I put it like that, this is obviously a bad thing. When you look back through history you find yourself mostly sort of laughing at the terrible people who forced Galileo to recant because they could not bear to believe that there were satellites orbiting Jupiter.

That the Earth was not the center of the universe. It sounds very clear that we critical thinking podcast all, as far as possible, be terribly open minded. And yet, at a sort of basic level, almost by definition, you cannot be open to stuff that you have no way of comprehending or systematizing or grasping. On some level, confirmation bias is an extreme example critical thinking podcast just the way that humans have to think.

Understanding and grasping and explaining stuff is based on the idea that you have preexisting ideas that you have some way of grasping it. And we can train ourselves to frame our beliefs about the world in a way that acknowledges they are beliefs, that they are most time working theories. DE: So is this the answer to different forms of heuristics? Is the answer to the problems that they throw up a permanent kind of skepticism?

TC: Permanent skepticism is really hard to pull off. But in general, skepticism is a shared project. And instead acknowledging that we are part of a shared project of trying to understand and to test.

So I think coming up with frameworks and structures and modes of practice and attitudes that allow for collaboration.

 

Improve Your Critical Thinking at Work

 

critical thinking podcast

 

Feb 26,  · Solid show idea, far to rambling Only made it to episode 16, seems like they like to hear themselves talk to much 30 minutes long rant about tangential topics is pretty standard, less a show about critical role more 3 guys talking about story telling where the topics are inspired by critical role/5(8). The Critical Thinking Initiative is far more successful in two regards: First, it grounds itself (for faculty) in contemporary research on critical thinking from fields such as composition, neuroscience, psychology, education, and others. Second, it translates that research into a pragmatic system that students and faculty in any field can put. Aug 16,  · ‎The Critical Thinking Initiative podcast is a response to the low critical thinking outcomes among U.S. students across all levels of education. Each episode dispels myths about teaching critical thinking education and discusses cutting-edge, research-supported ways to actually improve critical th /5(22).